Anastasia Zolotareva vs Eva Vedder Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 02:44 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Zolotareva vs E. Vedder

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zolotareva 1 - 0 Vedder
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anastasia Zolotareva winning 2 and Eva Vedder winning 0. The last match between Anastasia Zolotareva and Eva Vedder was at the Engie Open - Florianopolis, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Anastasia Zolotareva getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zolotareva | 1 |
| Vedder | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Engie Open - Florianopolis(10-21-25)
A. Zolotareva vs E. Vedder H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $12,205 |
| 64.63% (254-139) | Career Total W/L | 57.82% (255-186) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1-2) |
A. Zolotareva vs E. Vedder Match Preview:
- For second serve effectiveness, Eva Vedder currently exhibits better performance by winning 42.58% of points compared to Anastasia Zolotareva's 36.73% over the past six months. How crucial is second serve performance in predicting a match outcome? Recent data suggests it's quite important.
- In return games, Anastasia excels particularly on first serve returns, capturing 39.34% of points, markedly ahead of Eva's 30.81%. This suggests Anastasia might have an advantage when returning serves.
- Under pressure, Anastasia demonstrates slightly better breakpoint savings (49.11%) than Eva's 47.23%. Such resilience can be pivotal in tight match situations.
- Reviewing year-long match results, Anastasia boasts a higher winning percentage (67.27%) in comparison to Eva's (59.42%), suggesting a generally stronger recent performance.
- Analyzing surface preferences, Anastasia's top performance is on clay with a 69% win rate, while Eva's best results show on hard courts also with a 69% success rate.
- Examining the level of tournaments, Anastasia has a better win record in the Challengers/ITF compared to Eva, with 65.12% versus 60.38% respectively.
- Opponent quality analysis reveals that Eva has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 315.01 compared to Anastasia's 397.35.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Anastasia is slightly more successful, winning 50% compared to Eva's 48% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Anastasia Zolotareva appears to have the upper hand in various strategic areas of their game, making her a formidable opponent. Her superior breakpoint savings and higher win percentages, both over the last year and within her preferred surface context, suggest toughness and resilience.
Eva Vedder's higher opponent quality and recent strong second serve performance indicate that while she has been tested against stronger adversaries, she may find Anastasia's return game challenging.
Considering these factors, Anastasia Zolotareva is likely to win the upcoming match, capitalizing on her strengths and slightly better overall metrics in key aspects of the game.
Anastasia Zolotareva vs Eva Vedder Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Zolotareva vs E. Vedder H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:51:44 | Average Match Time | 1:51:44 |
| 58% (41/71) | 1st Serve % | 52% (36/69) |
| 63% (26/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (14/36) |
| 43% (13/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 54% (37/69) | Return Points Win % | 45% (32/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Zolotareva Recent Matches Played
E. Vedder Recent Matches Played

A. Zolotareva vs E. Vedder Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.63% (254/139) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.82% (255/186) |
| 60.56% (565/368) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.17% (578/433) |
| 53.95% (4706/4017) | Games Win/Loss | 53.26% (4956/4349) |
| 56.00% (70/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.74% (92/62) |
| 68.94% (182/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.98% (151/114) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (10/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 324 | Aces Total | 1075 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1561 | Total Double Faults | 1095 |
| 1:43:46 | Average Match Time | 1:32:32 |
| 460.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.41 |
| 69% (18404/26617) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15250/26192) |
| 57% (10430/18404) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9727/15217) |
| 40% (3258/8221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5343/10997) |
| 54% (2050/3831) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1553/3223) |
| 51% (13390/26216) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12157/26739) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 59.44% (107/73) | Challenger W/L | 55.81% (149/118) |
| 69.01% (147/66) | Futures W/L | 62.75% (96/57) |
| 64% (252/391) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (251/435) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 60% (59/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (45/95) |
| 61% (89/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (62/134) |
| 89% (231/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (271/226) |
| 11% (231/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (271/43) |
| 30% (162/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (170/28) |